<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the D-Tools Manufacturer Vantage Point (MVP) Program Matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.d-toolsblog.com/mvp-news/dtools-manufacturer-vantage-point-mvp-program-matters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.d-toolsblog.com/mvp-news/dtools-manufacturer-vantage-point-mvp-program-matters/</link>
	<description>a view from the top</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:24:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.d-toolsblog.com/mvp-news/dtools-manufacturer-vantage-point-mvp-program-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-2915</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.d-toolsblog.com/?p=2181#comment-2915</guid>
		<description>MVP would be great if it was updated quickly.  If a vendor announces new products - I expect within a week it should be in the MVP system - that&#039;s what I&#039;m paying for!  But it&#039;s not and that&#039;s why it&#039;s a great concept but failed in many ways.

AND - it shouldn&#039;t be the vendors responsibility - it should be D-Tools&#039;s to stay on top of them!!!  If not - then let them do it for free like all the other vendors do and we won&#039;t complain as much.

Don&#039;t get me wrong - I&#039;d LOVE to see it work your way - and I&#039;d love to see more vendors go into the MVP program - but without it being updated much quicker and being more accurate - it&#039;s of no use to me and our company - and I&#039;d assume other companies as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MVP would be great if it was updated quickly.  If a vendor announces new products &#8211; I expect within a week it should be in the MVP system &#8211; that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m paying for!  But it&#8217;s not and that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s a great concept but failed in many ways.</p>
<p>AND &#8211; it shouldn&#8217;t be the vendors responsibility &#8211; it should be D-Tools&#8217;s to stay on top of them!!!  If not &#8211; then let them do it for free like all the other vendors do and we won&#8217;t complain as much.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; I&#8217;d LOVE to see it work your way &#8211; and I&#8217;d love to see more vendors go into the MVP program &#8211; but without it being updated much quicker and being more accurate &#8211; it&#8217;s of no use to me and our company &#8211; and I&#8217;d assume other companies as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.d-toolsblog.com/mvp-news/dtools-manufacturer-vantage-point-mvp-program-matters/comment-page-1/#comment-22269</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.d-toolsblog.com/?p=2181#comment-22269</guid>
		<description>MVP would be great if it was updated quickly.  If a vendor announces new products - I expect within a week it should be in the MVP system - that&#039;s what I&#039;m paying for!  But it&#039;s not and that&#039;s why it&#039;s a great concept but failed in many ways.

AND - it shouldn&#039;t be the vendors responsibility - it should be D-Tools&#039;s to stay on top of them!!!  If not - then let them do it for free like all the other vendors do and we won&#039;t complain as much.

Don&#039;t get me wrong - I&#039;d LOVE to see it work your way - and I&#039;d love to see more vendors go into the MVP program - but without it being updated much quicker and being more accurate - it&#039;s of no use to me and our company - and I&#039;d assume other companies as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MVP would be great if it was updated quickly.  If a vendor announces new products &#8211; I expect within a week it should be in the MVP system &#8211; that&#8217;s what I&#8217;m paying for!  But it&#8217;s not and that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s a great concept but failed in many ways.</p>
<p>AND &#8211; it shouldn&#8217;t be the vendors responsibility &#8211; it should be D-Tools&#8217;s to stay on top of them!!!  If not &#8211; then let them do it for free like all the other vendors do and we won&#8217;t complain as much.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; I&#8217;d LOVE to see it work your way &#8211; and I&#8217;d love to see more vendors go into the MVP program &#8211; but without it being updated much quicker and being more accurate &#8211; it&#8217;s of no use to me and our company &#8211; and I&#8217;d assume other companies as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

